From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: time-delayed standbys |
Date: | 2011-06-30 09:00:21 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=nvWefCymUz8_mT_UK16trw-si6Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I am not sure exactly how walreceiver handles it if the disk is full.
>>> I assume it craps out and eventually retries, so probably what will
>>> happen is that, after the standby's pg_xlog directory fills up,
>>> walreceiver will sit there and error out until replay advances enough
>>> to remove a WAL file and thus permit some more data to be streamed.
>>
>> Nope, it gets stuck and stops there. Replay doesn't advance unless you
>> can somehow clear out some space manually; if the disk is full, the disk
>> is full, and PostgreSQL doesn't remove WAL files without being able to
>> write files first.
>>
>> Manual (or scripted) intervention is always necessary if you reach disk
>> 100% full.
>
> Wow, that's a pretty crappy failure mode... but I don't think we need
> to fix it just on account of this patch. It would be nice to fix, of
> course.
How is that different to running out of space in the main database?
If I try to pour a pint of milk into a small cup, I don't blame the cup.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2011-06-30 09:47:34 | Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix |
Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2011-06-30 08:37:43 | Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery) |