Re: 9.1 release scheduling (was Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.1 release scheduling (was Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch)
Date: 2011-06-07 17:53:23
Message-ID: BANLkTi=cNGcd1ngNcEUj_hp_sGmawNPNtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> Speaking of which, is it now safe to remove the "NOT VALID constraints
> don't dump properly" issue from the blocker list since the fix has
> been committed?

I hope so, because I just did that (before noticing this email from you).

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-07 17:56:05 Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-06-07 17:52:16 Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch