| From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory |
| Date: | 2011-06-01 21:27:48 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=cL_wdUkbXt33+Lzr9J_cdzrJbsw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I can't speak for Debian, but the above statement is 100% false for Red
> Hat. In any case, no RH system has ever expected users to issue pg_ctl
> start/stop directly, and I think the same is true for Debian, so the
> bizarre design wouldn't matter to us even if the case did apply.
>
that's right, the debian way is pg_ctlcluster
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2011-06-01 21:53:15 | Re: [PERFORM] Hash Anti Join performance degradation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-01 21:10:01 | Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory |