From: | Edison So <edison(dot)so2(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pasman pasmański <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: New feature: selectivity - new attribute in function |
Date: | 2011-04-16 20:59:48 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=Zov09extRL8S9bynFytWz+BgmZA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello Adrian,
Thank you for your reply again.
I will try to use your previous suggestion that I will backup 8.1 database
using 9.0 pg_dump and restore it to 9.0 database. Hopefully, 9.0 pg_dump
will work on 8.1 database. I have never taken a DB course and very very new
to Postgres.
Thanks again,
2011/4/16 Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
> On Saturday, April 16, 2011 1:10:39 pm Edison So wrote:
> > Thank you for the reply.
> >
> > It has nothing to do with programming. I was trying to back up the 8.1
> > database (using pg_dump) which had exceeded 2Gig limit according to a
> > response. When I tried to restore it using pg_restore to a 9.0 database,
> it
> > complained about custom archiver error and corruption and the whole
> backup
> > stopped.
> >
> > One response told me to try backing up 8.1 database using 9.0 pg_dump and
> > restore it to 9.0 database using 9.0 pg_restore. Another option, I can
> > think of, is to back up each table one at time and restore it one by one.
> > This way the 2G limit will never come up during the backup. However, it
> > requires a lot of works.
>
> If you are trying to restore forward to 9.0 you will need to use the 9.0
> version
> of pg_dump in either case. If you are trying to create a backup to use on
> the
> 8.1 database you might try -Fp instead of -Fc to create the dump(untested).
> The
> bug seems to be with the binary dump version not the text version.
>
> >
> > Any suggestion?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
>
--
Edison
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-04-16 21:02:34 | Re: New feature: selectivity - new attribute in function |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-04-16 20:52:30 | Re: New feature: selectivity - new attribute in function |