Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432
Date: 2011-06-27 17:52:19
Message-ID: BANLkTi=TVh=Oig1FMf9BkjUuO8=TiN4EKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> OK, fair enough.  Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2?

I'm not sure which patch you are referring to.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-27 17:53:34 Re: beta3?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-06-27 17:51:07 Re: beta3?