Re: [PATCH] Fix that NOSUPERUSER implies REPLICATION unless specified contrarily

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix that NOSUPERUSER implies REPLICATION unless specified contrarily
Date: 2011-04-13 19:30:06
Message-ID: BANLkTi=Sq5GXpfSvnqpzn5qhNcFUXECT9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Also add some regression tests for that behaviour.
>
> Found after seing a report about it in IRC by Daniel Grace.

This patch didn't apply cleanly for me, but I committed the basic fix.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-04-13 21:19:41 GEQO-induced crash with provably dummy relations
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-04-13 19:02:30 pg_regress multibyte -> encoding?