| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432 |
| Date: | 2011-06-27 18:03:55 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=PJZidmCYRCSx_Y6=doPj9qV7k3w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > OK, fair enough. ?Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2?
>>
>> I'm not sure which patch you are referring to.
>
> This one which makes 50432 the default port.
There appear to be some other changes mixed into this patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-06-27 18:05:23 | Re: per-column generic option |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-06-27 18:03:17 | Re: generate_series() Interpretation |