| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the visibility map crash-safe. |
| Date: | 2011-06-28 16:29:52 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=OMvhgvSe6_d985iS7-2dm3LYNpg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> out of curiosity, does it affect the previous benchmarks of the feature ?
I don't think there's much performance impact, because the only case
where we actually have to do any real work is when vacuum comes
through and marks a buffer we're about to update all-visible. It
would probably be good to run some tests to verify that, though. I'll
try to set something up.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-06-28 16:47:33 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-28 16:29:35 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | HuangQi | 2011-06-28 16:30:11 | Re: [Hackers]Backend quey plan process |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-28 16:29:35 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed |