From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers |
Date: | 2011-05-02 16:00:48 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=Neok1uboh4P4jxuGWBpbOFH2wdQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs |
Hello
one czech user reported a bug in documentation -
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/plpgsql-trigger.html
NEW
Data type RECORD; variable holding the new database row for
INSERT/UPDATE operations in row-level triggers. This variable is NULL
in statement-level triggers and for DELETE operations.
OLD
Data type RECORD; variable holding the old database row for
UPDATE/DELETE operations in row-level triggers. This variable is NULL
in statement-level triggers and for INSERT operations.
It isn't correct. NEW is not declared in DELETE trigger, OLD isn't
declared in INSERT
Regards
Pavel Stehule
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Savita | 2011-05-02 16:33:51 | BUG #6002: French character show garbled |
Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-05-02 10:45:14 | Re: BUG #6001: date_trunc is not timezone aware |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-05-02 16:47:01 | Re: Documentation tweaks: ALTER USER, statement-based middleware |
Previous Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-05-01 23:07:10 | Re: boolean states |