| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Date: | 2011-05-07 13:51:57 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=H7PeRBEXsZK9QipCugjLPvzjjAw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> We've been talking about renaming contrib for a long time, but that will
> not cut it. Classifying it and agreeing to maintain some parts of it
> the same way we maintain the core is what's asked here. Is there a will
> to go there?
I'm game. I doubt it'll be a lot more maintenance; we already pretty
much patch contrib when we patch everything else. It'll just be
easier to sort the wheat from the chaff.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-07 13:55:35 | Re: Fix for pg_upgrade user flag |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-07 13:50:40 | Re: Fix for pg_upgrade user flag |