Re: Incoming/Sent traffic data

Well, I'm suspicious too. :)

The logs that I pasted in the previous mail was with debug5, but you mean
the client driver itself? I'll give a look.

About the wireshark itself, in the link that I pasted, I put 2 screenshots
about the measure, at a gross look at it, You can easily tell that the
packages are somewhat different.

The java hava a lot of /D/D/D/D

Maybe it's about this:

http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/protocol-error-fields.html

2011/5/13 Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>

> On 13 May 2011 16:38, Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca <israel(dot)bgf(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> +1 too. I just asked because its common to get shot at mailists after a
> >> little of 'off-topic'.
> >
> > Well afters tons of tests, using my brand new Wireshark skills (thanks
> > Maciek), and I got a very strange result (even stranger than before):
> >
> > I created a new database for the tests, 1 'Person' table, 2 columns (id,
> > name), 7000++ registers.
> >
> > The traffic difference was:
> >
> > Java 220861 Bytes
> > Python 29014 Bytes
>
> Well, your next step should be compare the two wireshark captures and
> see what's being done differently in the two cases.
> You can run the JDBC driver with loglevel=2 and it'll tell you what it
> is doing, too. But really, if what you care about is what's on the
> network, then wireshark is the right tool for that job.
>
> I would be suspicious of your Python measurements, FWIW. 29kB for 7k
> rows implies you're only receiving ~4 bytes per row, which seems far
> too low.
>
> Oliver
>