From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't use "cp -i" in the example WAL archive_command. |
Date: | 2011-06-18 08:05:10 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=9D4FqPGbm_P2eMmJW6yQTzq6q0w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 18 June 2011 04:13, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> Wow, this is the first I am hearing GNU cp -i can return zero exit if it
>> doesn't do the copy. I tested this on Ubuntu 10.04 using cp 7.4 and
>> got:
>>
>> $ touch x y
>> $ cp -i x y; echo $?
>> cp: overwrite `y'? n
>> 0
>>
>> I see the same on my anchent BSD/OS machine too:
>>
>> $ touch x y
>> $ cp -i x y; echo $?
>> overwrite y? n
>> 0
>>
>> Were we expecting an error if the file already existed? Assuming that,
>> we should assume the file will always exist so basically archiving will
>> never progress. Is this what we want? I just wasn't aware we were
>> expecting an already-existing this to be an error --- I thought we just
>> didn't want to overwrite it.
>
> I tested on FreeBSD 7.4 and saw a 1 error return:
>
> $ touch x y
> $ cp -i x y; echo $?
> overwrite y? (y/n [n]) n
> not overwritten
> 1
And on a Mac (so through Darwin 10.7.0 a BSD version too):
toucan:tmp thom$ touch x y
toucan:tmp thom$ cp -i x y; echo $?
overwrite y? (y/n [n]) n
not overwritten
1
Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | User Hinoue | 2011-06-18 11:26:42 | psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Now SQLDescribeCol() can detect the changes of |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-06-18 03:13:09 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't use "cp -i" in the example WAL archive_command. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-06-18 08:10:01 | Re: Range Types and extensions |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2011-06-18 06:57:22 | Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID |