Re: time-delayed standbys

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: time-delayed standbys
Date: 2011-06-30 03:27:59
Message-ID: BANLkTi=8jm4hniKMauE4z9VYDrtYGd5sAw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We should disable this feature also after recovery reaches the stop
> point (specified in recovery_target_xxx)?

Another comment; it's very helpful to document the behavior of delayed standby
when promoting or after reaching the stop point.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2011-06-30 03:47:40 Re: SECURITY LABEL on shared database object
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-06-30 03:23:58 Re: time-delayed standbys