| From: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific |
| Date: | 2011-06-21 01:25:07 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=720TWHg+h4QTNYthnZ=t1MZrDXQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 June 2011 11:11, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I realize I took out most of the fun of this patch from you, but -- are
> you still planning to do some more exhaustive testing of it? I checked
> some funny scenarios (including include files and groups) but it's not
> all that unlikely that I missed some cases. I also didn't check any
> auth method other than ident, md5 and trust, 'cause I don't have what's
> required for anything else. (It's a pity that the regression tests
> don't exercise anything else.)
I've pretty much tested all the things I can think to test, and I'm in
the same boat as you re auth methods. If there are bugs, I think they
will be of the obscure kind, that only reveal themselves under
peculiar circumstances.
Cheers,
BJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Ports | 2011-06-21 02:18:28 | Re: pika buildfarm member failure on isolationCheck tests |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-21 01:11:59 | Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific |