From: | Carl von Clausewitz <clausewitz45(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Vacuumdb error |
Date: | 2011-04-14 20:17:54 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=1XnC5fHK078X1Wj5+-hcHkmC0xA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Everything was fine, the reordered script fixed everything. Thanks all.
Regards,
Carl
2011/4/14 Carl von Clausewitz <clausewitz45(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Ok thanks, the information. I've made the mistake, I will change the
> script, but I will try, that Vidhya told me. Let me see, what will going
> on.
>
> Regards,
> Carl
>
> 2011/4/14 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>
>> Carl von Clausewitz <clausewitz45(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > Maintenance:
>> > #!/bin/sh
>> > date >> /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
>> > /usr/local/bin/reindexdb --all --username=cvc >>
>> > /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
>> > echo "Reindex done" >> /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
>> > /usr/local/bin/vacuumdb --all --full --analyze --username=cvc >>
>> > /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
>> > echo "Vacuum done" >> /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
>>
>> Just FYI, the reindex step is 100% useless if you're going to do a
>> vacuum full afterwards.
>>
>> Before 9.0 there was some value in doing vacuum full and then reindex,
>> but none whatsoever in the other ordering. As of 9.0 there's just no
>> point at all in doing both. VACUUM FULL rebuilds the indexes anyway.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-04-14 20:42:24 | Re: SSDs with Postgresql? |
Previous Message | David Kerr | 2011-04-14 19:36:57 | Re: Calculating memory allocaiton per process |