Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22

From: Adam Witney <awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, dbdpg-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22
Date: 2003-04-08 13:50:14
Message-ID: BAB89226.1637B%a.witney@sghms.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> I am not sure about the malloc errors, but the "isn't numeric" errors
> should be fixed by grabbing an updated version of DBD::Pg.

This is DBD-Pg-1.22, do you mean newer than that?

> By the way, the latest stable version of perl is 5.8.0. You may want
> to consider jumping to that as long as you are upgrading.

The only thing is that I have heard suggestions that replacing the stock
perl on OS X with 5.8 can cause problems with certain system functions

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Witney 2003-04-08 13:55:33 Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22
Previous Message Rudy Lippan 2003-04-08 13:32:04 Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22