> On Feb 5, 2021, at 9:37 AM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/5/21 10:22 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 2/5/21 9:11 AM, Ron wrote:
>>> Obviously... don't use 300 threads.
>>>
>> No, no Ron. Clearly the answer is more CPUs
>
> I hope you're being sarcastic.
>
> --
> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
>
Ron, I was being sarcastic, but I’ve gone over the thread and I do not see any mention of the number of cores on the server. If it has a single quad core chip then the queue for each processor could be on average 75 deep at the outset, all of them anxiously awaiting data. -j connections are processes, correct? Not threads.
Atul, if you list the tools you know and have used for watching system performance and then others can perhaps suggest alternatives (or re-interpret results)