From: | decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: White paper on very big databases |
Date: | 2009-02-21 04:18:28 |
Message-ID: | B9941BB7-7FFA-4DB5-BEBF-7E2C6FCB8093@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:
> The study has to be based on real usecases, so, the first thing is
> that
> every usecase may become of public knowledge. So I don't want someone
> telling me "we have 5 Tb here, we do it this way.. but shhh don't tell
> my name". This will not work, because detractors may say everything in
> the study is wrong, false and pro-PostgreSQL...
Our largest database is currently at 850GB (yeah, not quite 1TB ;P),
but it's also OLTP. It's been a *long* time since I've looked, but
I'm pretty sure it's doing on the order of 100TPS. I also rather
doubt that the company would have an issue doing a case study.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-02-24 23:22:36 | US Conferences in next 5 months, shirts |
Previous Message | Richard Broersma | 2009-02-18 15:18:54 | Re: Bootable Flash Drive Installation Scripts |