From: | Mitch Vincent <mitch(at)concept-factory(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Doug Fields <dfields-pg-general(at)pexicom(dot)com>, NunoACHenriques <nach(at)fct(dot)unl(dot)pt> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: is there any backend (server) timeout |
Date: | 2002-05-28 01:12:21 |
Message-ID: | B9182785.4F1%mitch@concept-factory.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 5/27/02 4:18 PM, "Doug Fields" <dfields-pg-general(at)pexicom(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> server closed the connection unexpectedly
>> This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>> before or while processing the request.
>> The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
>> You are currently not connected to a database.
>
> I had this happen to me the other day, when my server booted with only 1GB
> of RAM instead of the usual 2GB. PostgreSQL started thrashing something
> fierce since I give it 1.4GB of shared memory, and not too long after that
> I got that same message in a JDBC SQLException.
>
> That doesn't really help, but...
>
> Doug
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
That's a pretty standard "PostgreSQL did something bad" message, so without
more information it's hard to know what happened... Can you replicate this
crash?
-Mitch
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-05-28 01:17:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-05-28 01:00:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - 64 bit puzzle |