Re: increasing shared buffers: how much should be removed

On 5-Sep-06, at 9:31 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> On 9/1/06, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I think 'shared buffers' is one of the most overrated settings
>> from a
>> >> performance standpoint. however you must ensure there is
>> enough for
>> >> things the server does besides caching. It used to be a bigger
>> deal
>> >> than it is in modern versionf of postgresql modern operating
>> systems.
>>
>> Previous to 8.1 I would agree with you, but as of 8.1 it is
>> probably the
>> most underrated.
>
> really? what are the relative advantages of raising shared buffers? I
> was thinking maybe there might be less context switches in high load
> environments...I'm really curious what you have to say here.

Have you tried it ? The results are quite dramatic.

So if shared buffers aren't the first tool you reach for, what is ?
>
> merlin
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>