| From: | Steve Lane <slane(at)fmpro(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Backup very large databases |
| Date: | 2002-04-20 13:56:43 |
| Message-ID: | B8E6DDCB.C23C%slane@fmpro.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 4/19/02 10:24 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> writes:
>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Francisco Reyes wrote:
>>> I have about 7GB worth of data.
>
>> I anticipate having a 30-50 GB or larger database in the next few months.
>
> FWIW, there are people out there with multi-hundred-GB to TB databases
> (you might try searching the archives for "American Chemical Society",
> for instance). So you're not pioneers.
>
> I do agree that the special problems of running huge DBs on Postgres
> might belong in a pgsql-perform list rather than any of the regular
> lists. Anyone else agree? Or does the pgsql-general list readership
> want to see this stuff?
I'd like to see it. It seems to me all of those discussions could have at
least some implication for the "low end".
-- sgl
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Francisco Reyes | 2002-04-20 14:08:15 | Re: Backup very large databases |
| Previous Message | Roderick A. Anderson | 2002-04-20 13:37:09 | Re: Backup very large databases |