Re: kill -KILL: What happens?

From: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: kill -KILL: What happens?
Date: 2011-05-27 09:01:11
Message-ID: B8DA9FF5-5090-4237-8F60-D552A76DC433@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May7, 2011, at 03:50 , Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:
>> I've realized that POSIX actually *does* provide a way to receive a signal -
>> the SIGIO machinery. I've modified my test case do to that. To simplify things,
>> I've removed support for multiple life sign objects.
>>
>> <snipped>
> Are you planning to develop this into a patch for 9.2?

Sorry for the extremely late answer - I received this mail while I was on
vacation, and then forgot to answer it once I came back :-(

Anyway, I'm glad to see that Peter Geoghegan has picked this up
any turned this into an actual patch.

Extremely cool!

best regards,
Florian Pflug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-05-27 09:06:39 compatibility issue with DirectFunctionCall1
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-05-27 09:00:13 Re: switch UNLOGGED to LOGGED