From: | "Duran, Danilo" <danilod(at)amazon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | replication slot restart_lsn initialization |
Date: | 2015-05-06 00:42:14 |
Message-ID: | B8D538AC5587C84898B261FCB8C7D8A41FDE1017@ex10-mbx-36009.ant.amazon.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
I am looking to better understand the thought behind a replication slot's restart_lsn initialization. Currently in 9.4 and master, a replication slot's restart_lsn is set to InvalidXLogRecPtr and will only start tracking restart_lsn once a walreceiver has confirmed receipt of an lsn.
Was there any consideration for initializing restart_lsn to the latest WAL write pointer when a slot is created? Or for allowing an optional parameter in pg_create_(physical|logical)_replication_slot() for specifying the restart_lsn at slot creation?
I believe there are valid usage patterns where the user would like to start holding transaction logs from being removed/recycled during the time that the standby is being restored from base backup. Currently this can be worked around by using pg_receivexlog immediately after creating the replication slot but it feels kind of hacky.
It is also strange that the return type for pg_create_(physical|logical)_replication_slot includes xlog_position but as far as I can tell, it will never contain a value. Is this intended for something in the future?
Thanks,
Danilo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-06 00:53:23 | Re: replication slot restart_lsn initialization |
Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2015-05-05 22:53:41 | Re: BRIN range operator class |