Re: Tuning 7.2? Different than 7.1.3?

From: Hunter Hillegas <lists(at)lastonepicked(dot)com>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tuning 7.2? Different than 7.1.3?
Date: 2002-03-12 22:04:49
Message-ID: B8B3BB81.34B3F%lists@lastonepicked.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

What value would you recommend?

> From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:14:38 -0800 (PST)
> To: Hunter Hillegas <lists(at)lastonepicked(dot)com>
> Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Tuning 7.2? Different than 7.1.3?
>
>> In postgresql.conf:
>>
>> max_connections = 200
>> shared_buffers = 400
>
> That shared_buffer setting is pretty low for that number of connections.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kacper Nowicki 2002-03-12 22:06:31 index on large table
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2002-03-12 21:45:29 Re: Can a field be a primary key as well as a foreign key?