| From: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...) |
| Date: | 2008-03-26 19:30:43 |
| Message-ID: | B82809F3-BA9B-46DD-A938-ED4246B42D15@blighty.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
> On Wednesday 26. March 2008, Ron Mayer wrote:
>
>> I'd prefer a "pg" program that took as arguments
>> the command. So you'd have "pg createdb" instead
>> of "pg_createdb".
>>
>> There are many precedents. "cvs update", "git pull"
>> "apt-get install".
>>
>> Anyone else like this approach?
>
> I'll second that. It would be much easier on the brain, as you might
> issue a "pg --help" if you don't remember the exact syntax or even the
> name of each command.
Seems like it'd be a fair bit more work to do than a simple
rename, but the end result seems a nice clean solution.
Would it make it more difficult to do a client-only
installation if "pg" replaced both things like pg_ctl and
initdb as well as createdb and createuser, though?
Cheers,
Steve
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-26 19:31:40 | Re: page is uninitialized --- fixing |
| Previous Message | Alex Vinogradovs | 2008-03-26 19:20:26 | Re: IBM investing in EnterpriseDB |