Re: Bad link for win32/latest

On 26 sep 2008, at 13.39, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> Dave Page wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Magnus Hagander
>> <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Robert Treat wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 14:08:58 Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/latest, which should point to
>>>>> 8.3.4, is still pointing to 8.3.3.
>>>>>
>>>> Actually the whole main directory needs to be updated, it isn't
>>>> listing 8.3.4
>>>> or 8.2.10... http://wwwmaster.postgresql.org/ftp/
>>> I've updated svr1, I *think* that's the master and it should push
>>> out
>>> soon :-)
>>>
>>> I can never remember, on what schedule do we remove old versions?
>>> Did we
>>> say "keep current and one older"? In that case, there is some
>>> removing
>>> to do as well... In binary, for example, we have 8.2.5, 6, 7, 8, 9
>>> and
>>> 10 ATM - that just seems like a waste of space to me. For source, we
>>> have 8.2.7, 9 and 10, and in the 8.3 series 8.3.1, 3 and 4. We
>>> also have
>>> source/OLD which has 8.3.0, 8.2.5 and 8.2.6. All in all, seems
>>> we're not
>>> very consistent :-(
>>>
>>> If we don't have a policy, let's make one - get your arguments
>>> out :-)
>>
>> Marc was managing that (and the symlinks) iirc. I'm not sure what
>> rules he was working to.
>>
>
> Marc? What's the usual deal?
>

Marc? Afaik this has not been resolved yet?

/Magnus