Re: questions about very large table and partitioning

From: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
To: Enrico Sirola <enrico(dot)sirola(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: fdu(dot)xiaojf(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: questions about very large table and partitioning
Date: 2008-02-18 17:42:59
Message-ID: B74980F0-FF23-4461-A3E7-D2CFF5EAA096@myemma.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Feb 18, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Enrico Sirola wrote:

>
> Il giorno 18/feb/08, alle ore 17:37, fdu(dot)xiaojf(at)gmail(dot)com ha scritto:
>> 1) PostgreSQL only support partition by inheritance, and rules
>> have to
>> be created for each child table, this will result *a lot of* rules if
>> the number of child tables is large.
>>
>> Are there some smart ways to avoid this kind of mass ?
>
> you can obtain the same result using a trigger, but you must
> replace the trigger function every time you add/remove a partition.

This is not strictly true. If you use EXECUTE to run dynamically
built INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements you don't have to replace the
trigger each time.

Erik Jones

DBA | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond O'Donnell 2008-02-18 17:46:16 Re: Auto incrementing primary keys
Previous Message Enrico Sirola 2008-02-18 17:23:32 Re: questions about very large table and partitioning