From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Microsoft buys GitHub, is this a threat to open-source |
Date: | 2018-06-04 17:36:28 |
Message-ID: | B715312E-B16F-476D-A44F-D6CD2DF95CB4@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 4 Jun 2018, at 18:31, Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> No but it does show why using non open source platforms for open source
>> projects is an inherently bad idea.
>
> Joshua,
>
> Sourceforge seems to be out of favor, too, so are there any open source
> platforms that provide services that sourceforge and github do?
Both GitLab and BitBucket are commonly suggested.
Neither seems great, but when push comes to shove "they'll do". :)
For people that are ok with standing up their own servers, there are more
options. Gitea (Open Source GitHub clone) is pretty good:
It's also very efficient resource wise (unlike GitLab), so can run effectively
on tiny hardware. Even Raspberry Pi level can do a decent job for small scale
stuff.
Naturally, anyone with team-sized needs would run it on appropriate hardware. ;)
+ Justin
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2018-06-04 17:46:57 | Re: Microsoft buys GitHub, is this a threat to open-source |
Previous Message | Rich Shepard | 2018-06-04 17:31:56 | Re: Microsoft buys GitHub, is this a threat to open-source |