From: | "Hell, Robert" <Robert(dot)Hell(at)fabasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Looking for bottleneck during load test |
Date: | 2008-04-07 12:16:11 |
Message-ID: | B710F3299F04664DB6B37C258FDEEB94015F1BA1@FABAMAIL.fabagl.fabasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
We have a PostgreSQL 8.2.7 database (~230 GB) running on a machine with 8 Intel Xeon Cores and 32 GB RAM (64-bit Linux 2.6.18). Data is stored on an EMC² CLARiiON on RAID 1/0 (8 x 146 GB 15k rpm).
When we do random I/O with a small test tool (reading random 8k blocks from big files in 200 threads) on the disk we retrieve data with about 25 MB/s.
For testing purpose a test set of about 700.000 queries (those were logged during a problem situation) are executed against the database in 180 concurrent threads.
Some of the queries are very small and fast - other ones read more than 50000 blocks. All queries are selects (using cursors) - there is only read activity on the database.
By setting tuple_fraction for cursors to 0.0 instead of 0.1 (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-04/msg00018.php) we reduced reads during the test (pg_statio_all_tables):
- 8.2.7
reads from disk: 4.395.276, reads from cache: 471.575.925
- 8.2.7 cursor_tuple_fraction=0.0
Reads from disk: 3.406.164, reads from cache: 37.924.625
But the duration of the test was only reduced by 18 % (from 110 minutes to 90 minutes).
When running the test with tuple_fraction=0.0 we observe the following on the server:
- avg read from disk is at 7 MB/s
- when we start the random I/O tool during the test we again read data with about 25 MB/s from disk (for me it seems that disk isn't the bottleneck)
- cpu time is divided between idle and iowait - user and system cpu are practically zero
- there are from 5000 to 10000 context switches per second
I can't see a bottleneck here. Does anyone has an explanation for that behavior?
Regards,
Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivan Voras | 2008-04-07 12:37:32 | Re: Looking for bottleneck during load test |
Previous Message | Matthew | 2008-04-07 10:50:27 | Re: Forcing more agressive index scans for BITMAP AND |