Re: OpenSSL v3 performance regressions

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL v3 performance regressions
Date: 2023-09-26 08:52:06
Message-ID: B6B3C9FB-8D44-4CC9-BFB1-37ED60E379DA@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 26 Sep 2023, at 10:36, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info> wrote:

> Should Postgres support alternative SSL libraries has HAProxy?

PostgreSQL can be built with LibreSSL instead of OpenSSL, which may or may not
be a better option performance wise for a particular application. Benchmarking
your workload is key to understanding performance, a lot of the regressions
pointed to in that blogpost wont affect postgres.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message a.rybakina 2023-09-26 09:08:52 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-09-26 08:40:17 Re: Move global variables of pgoutput to plugin private scope.