Re: postgres vs. oracle for very large tables

From: "Graves, John" <jgraves(at)evolveddigital(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres vs. oracle for very large tables
Date: 2006-05-16 14:50:38
Message-ID: B692116E9BDD0C4AA3F9D91B2DE079E801B87F6E@THOR.evolveddigital.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 15 May 2006 16:00:04 -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> 5: You're gonna need to load test this to see. You can get
> the oracle 10G express for free. I think that one handles
> multiple connections, but is limited to 2 gigs of data.

The exact limitations of Oracle Database XE are as follows:

"Any use of the Oracle Database Express Edition is subject to the following limitations;
1. Express Edition is limited to a single instance on any server;
2. Express Edition may be installed on a multiple CPU server, but may only be executed on one processor in any server;
3. Express Edition may only be used to support up to 4GB of user data (not including Express Edition system data);
4. Express Edition may use up to 1 GB RAM of available memory."

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Forums @ Existanze 2006-05-16 14:51:20 Re: FW: Getting information about sequences
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-05-16 14:45:42 Re: FW: Getting information about sequences