Re: Slashdot and PostgreSQL

From: Hunter Hillegas <hunter(at)lastonepicked(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, postgreSQLList <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slashdot and PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-01-17 03:03:57
Message-ID: B68A4B9D.1057A%hunter@lastonepicked.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

I don't think they're moving the actual Slashdot site to PostgreSQL... They
paid a bunch of money to the mySQL folks to add replication support to
mySQL...

I think other sites based on Slashcode wanted to be able to use PostgreSQL
though...

Hunter

> From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:54:37 -0500 (EST)
> To: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: [GENERAL] Slashdot and PostgreSQL
>
> I see on Slashdot that:
>
> Slashcode 2.0 ("Bender") is officially in beta. We now have themes,
> plugins, an abstacted database layer (MySQL support is beta, PostreSQL
> is alpha, so finally the rivalry can be settled ;)
>
> So, while Sourceforge has moved to PostgreSQL, seems like Slashdot may
> well too.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-17 03:08:14 Re: Slashdot and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-17 02:54:37 Slashdot and PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-17 03:08:14 Re: Slashdot and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-17 02:54:37 Slashdot and PostgreSQL