Re: Oracle vs PG

From: Ravi Krishna <srkrishna1(at)aol(dot)com>
To: PG List <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle vs PG
Date: 2018-10-23 22:44:01
Message-ID: B66CE23A-3FBC-48B8-B3CD-78C5B5636B30@aol.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

e to handle the pressure, slowing down the overall database performance, the report said."
>
> Again, pretty much content-free. For all you know some application was creating savepoints, needlessly:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-savepoint.html
>
> and not cleaning up after itself.
>
> The content is here:
>
> "Following the Prime Day outage, Amazon engineers filled out a 25-page report, which Amazon calls a correction of error. It's a standard process that Amazon uses to try to understand why a major incident took place and how to keep it from happening in the future."
>
> Not sure if that is publicly available or not, though my hunch is no.

I think PG gurus in this list can expand on the clue as to what could have gone wrong with savepoints in PG under heavy load.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ravi Krishna 2018-10-23 23:35:37 Re: Oracle vs PG
Previous Message Ravi Krishna 2018-10-23 22:41:16 Re: Oracle vs PG