From: | "Strong, David" <david(dot)strong(at)unisys(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Faster StrNCpy |
Date: | 2006-09-27 13:02:46 |
Message-ID: | B6419AF36AC8524082E1BC17DA2506E802579E0C@USMV-EXCH2.na.uis.unisys.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom,
Let us know when you've added strlcpy () and we'll be happy to run some tests on the new code.
David
________________________________
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Tom Lane
Sent: Tue 9/26/2006 7:25 PM
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Neil Conway; Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Faster StrNCpy
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> What I'd like to do immediately is put in strlcpy() and hit the two or
>> three places I think are performance-relevant.
> Immediately? Presumably you mean for 8.3?
No, I mean now. This is a performance bug and it's still open season on
bugs. If we were close to having a release-candidate version, I'd hold
off, but the above proposal seems sufficiently low-risk for the current
stage of the cycle.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Mair | 2006-09-27 13:07:28 | Re: Please to technical check of upcoming release |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-09-27 11:30:43 | Re: Cross-table statistics idea |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-09-27 13:22:30 | Re: Faster StrNCpy |
Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2006-09-27 09:07:04 | Re: Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code |