Re: Password complexities in Postgres v14.6

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Daulat <daulat(dot)dba(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Password complexities in Postgres v14.6
Date: 2022-12-16 16:25:57
Message-ID: B5EB213A-CE37-44E0-BCB3-9456C1D8FDE9@elevated-dev.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

> On Dec 16, 2022, at 9:17 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> ...

> (I agree that forced password rotations are also an obsolete security
> practice, but figured that one bit of push-back at a time was enough.)

I believe that NIST is now on board with this opinion, aren't they?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2022-12-16 16:28:49 Re: Password complexities in Postgres v14.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-12-16 16:17:29 Re: Password complexities in Postgres v14.6