From: | "lists(at)mgreg(dot)com" <lists(at)mgreg(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Connect without specifying a database? |
Date: | 2009-04-11 16:10:33 |
Message-ID: | B5C97ED5-2D21-46EF-ABAC-D8670D476C14@mgreg.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Apr 11, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> There are, although we don't spell the commands like that. This is
> not
> relevant to the question of whether it makes sense to connect without
> being connected to a specific database. It doesn't, because the
> catalogs that you have to inspect to find out anything are
> database-specific.
>
> regards, tom lane
I'm sorry, I'm confused by your reply. I may have said "table" when I
meant "database". I believe it absolutely *does* make sense to
connect without specifying a database first. What if you hit that
edge case where there are in fact no databases? I suppose you could
always run "createdb" just in case before you do anything else, but
that seems counterintuitive.
What do you mean when you say the "catalogs...are database-
specific" ? If I'm understanding what you're saying, my whole point
is that I don't want to be tied to a database to do any kind of
querying about the PG engine itself. Does that make sense?
Best,
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2009-04-11 16:35:23 | Re: Connect without specifying a database? |
Previous Message | Ries van Twisk | 2009-04-11 16:00:56 | Re: Connect without specifying a database? |