Re: Reg:Connection Object

From: "Manikandan C" <manikandanc(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com>
To: "sandhya" <sandhyar(at)amiindia(dot)co(dot)in>
Cc: "Askar Zaidi" <askar(at)mail(dot)nplindia(dot)ernet(dot)in>, "postgre" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reg:Connection Object
Date: 2005-09-02 07:57:06
Message-ID: B4AF8C04F762D246A1E38EC5DFAEFC0B223234@blrmail2.aus.pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin


I hope, U can have a structure that have members as the "user name" and the "Connection object". Whenever a new connection is made, U can create instances of this structure. Based on the user name, you can pass the appropriate instance to the function.

Hope this will help you.
Is this what you want?

Regards,
Mani

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Michael Fuhr
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 11:29 AM
To: sandhya
Cc: Askar Zaidi; postgre
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Reg:Connection Object

On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:19:53AM +0530, sandhya wrote:
> In case of multiple users what will happen?
> Each must have different connection objects right!

That's why global variables are bad. But what's wrong with passing
a PGconn * to various functions? If that's a problem in your
application then please explain why; it's still not clear what
difficulties you're having. Perhaps it would help if you posted a
simple but complete example program that shows what you're trying
to do.

As I mentioned before, this thread is off-topic for pgsql-admin;
it would be more appropriate in pgsql-interfaces or pgsql-general.

--
Michael Fuhr

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-09-02 14:08:08 Re: pg_dumpall problem - duplicated users
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-09-02 05:58:55 Re: Reg:Connection Object