From: | kevin kempter <kevin(at)kevinkempterllc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Join runs for > 10 hours and then fills up >1.3TB of disk space |
Date: | 2008-05-16 08:38:04 |
Message-ID: | B4997F15-81F9-4633-9790-B569FB39E843@kevinkempterllc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On further investigation it turns out that I/we have a serious data
issue in that my small table is full of 'UNKNOWN' tags so my query
cannot associate the data correctly - thus I will end up with 2+
billion rows.
Thanks everyone for your help
On May 16, 2008, at 1:38 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 00:31 -0600, kevin kempter wrote:
>
>> I'm running the join shown below and it takes > 10 hours and
>> eventually runs out of disk space on a 1.4TB file system
>
> Well, running in 10 hours doesn't mean there's a software problem, nor
> does running out of disk space.
>
> Please crunch some numbers before you ask, such as how much disk space
> was used by the query, how big you'd expect it to be etc, plus provide
> information such as what the primary key of the large table is and
> what
> is your release level is etc..
>
> Are you sure you want to retrieve an estimated 3 billion rows? Can you
> cope if that estimate is wrong and the true figure is much higher? Do
> you think the estimate is realistic?
>
> --
> Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> )
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | david | 2008-05-16 09:58:08 | Re: which ext3 fs type should I use for postgresql |
Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2008-05-16 08:36:11 | Re: Join runs for > 10 hours and then fills up >1.3TB of disk space |