Re: bytea vs. pg_dump

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date: 2009-07-30 22:41:32
Message-ID: B4455991F8BA5B1C029D0B01@teje
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On Freitag, Juli 24, 2009 20:50:16 +0200 Bernd Helmle
<mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:

> I don't believe i can do very much this weekend...

I have to delay that until sunday, but will get my hands on some
performance and function tests again, since i have access on the customer
machine then.

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-30 23:59:23 Re: RFD: Don't force plpgsql IN parameters to constant
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2009-07-30 22:38:25 Re: mixed, named notation support