From: | Philip Semanchuk <philip(at)americanefficient(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Avoid excessive inlining? |
Date: | 2020-12-22 14:57:19 |
Message-ID: | B419713D-368F-433A-986F-D6027921D743@americanefficient.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On Dec 22, 2020, at 8:40 AM, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-12-21 at 11:45 -0500, Philip Semanchuk wrote:
>>> On Dec 19, 2020, at 12:59 AM, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> wrote:
>>> Is there a way to avoid excessive inlining when writing pure SQL functions, without having to use PL/pgSQL?
>>
>> The rules for inlining are here:
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Inlining_of_SQL_functions
>>
>> According to those rules, if you declared your SQL function as VOLATILE, then Postgres wouldn’t
>> inline it. From your question, I’m not sure if you want to have the same function inlined
>> sometimes and not others. I can’t think of a way to do that offhand.
>
> Where do you see that? As far as I know, VOLATILE is the best choice if you
> want the function to be inlined.
Ugh, you’re absolutely right, and I’m sorry for spreading misinformation. That’s what I get from quoting from memory rather than reading the link that I posted.
>
> I would say that the simplest way to prevent a function from being inlined
> is to set a parameter on it:
>
> ALTER FUNCTION f() SET enable_seqscan = on;
I appreciate the correction and education.
Cheers
Philip
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2020-12-22 16:10:35 | Re: Avoid excessive inlining? |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2020-12-22 13:40:20 | Re: Avoid excessive inlining? |