Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2025-04-08 10:34:02
Message-ID: B2A4AB83-C99D-4DF7-A310-50BF857739DA@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 8 Apr 2025, at 04:10, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 3:26 PM Jacob Champion
> <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Sounds good. Any opinions from the gallery on what a "libpq plugin
>> subdirectory" in pkglibdir should be called? ("client", "modules",
>> "plugins"...?)
>
> Hm, one immediate consequence of hardcoding pkglibdir is that we can
> no longer rely on LD_LIBRARY_PATH for pre-installation testing.
> (Contrast with the server, which is able to relocate extension paths
> based on its executable location.)

That strikes me as a signifant drawback.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-04-08 10:46:16 Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability
Previous Message Aya Iwata (Fujitsu) 2025-04-08 10:29:48 RE: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) - take2