From: | Pruner Jan <pruner(at)cekia(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Pieter Grimmerink <p(dot)grimmerink(at)home(dot)nl>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: Re: Replace MSSQL by PostgreSQL ? |
Date: | 2001-05-28 06:18:51 |
Message-ID: | B1CCF4735D43D311906D00A0243DF4961FC6D5@mail.cekia.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi, Pieter,
there is no problem with ODBC, but
you have to move your database architecture to PostgreSQL.
There are some problems with the the lack of SQL compatibleness between MS &
PG (of course - no standard).
MS use getdate() to get current_timestamp etc.
I stopped porting because I have table 'name' on MS, but on PG is it
impossible.
regards,
Jan Pruner
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Per-Olof Pettersson [mailto:pgsql(at)peope(dot)net]
> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 5:15 AM
> To: Pieter Grimmerink; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [GENERAL] Re: Replace MSSQL by PostgreSQL ?
>
>
> Pieter Grimmerink wrote:
>
> > I have a windows application using a MSSQL (the free 2gig
> version) database.
> > When the application is first started, I have to select
> 'sql server' and
> > then I need to
> > give the sql setup (servername, user+pass) in an ODBC
> datasource setup
> > dialog.
> >
> > Now I am wondering, would there be a chance I could use
> PostgreSQL on my
> > linux
> > server, with an ODBC windows driver, and let this
> application create and use
> > a postgresql database instead, without having to make changes to the
> > application
> > itself?
> >
> > Or do I have a way to positive idea about ODBC interfaces...
> >
> > Right now I tried to get this working, I installed
> postgresql 7.1, and the
> > postgresql ODBC
> > driver for windows, but I can't even import database tables
> from postgresql
> > in MSAccess.
> > But this could very well be because the highest version I
> can select in the
> > driver is the 6.4/6.5
> > protocol.
> >
> > The only way to convince people to move from MSSQL to
> PostgreSQL would be
> > when they don't notice the difference ;-)
> >
> > Should I go on with this, or don't I have a chance?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pieter
> >
> >
> >
>
> Hi
>
> First, try to get the latest driver. It shows support for
> 7.x. You can
> find it at http://odbc.postgresql.org/
>
> Next, you need to configure the datasource. By default it is
> read-only.
> And there are some other issues for how it is supposed to interpret
> TEXT-types and the like.
> http://www.sevainc.com/Access/PostgreSQL_ODBC_Configuration.html
>
> These links are taken from
> http://techdocs.postgresql.org/oresources.php
>
> Best regards
> Per-Olof Pettersson
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Per-Olof Pettersson | 2001-05-28 06:32:06 | Re: COPY with default values? |
Previous Message | Per-Olof Pettersson | 2001-05-28 03:51:58 | Unique value over different servers |