| From: | Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | rammohan ganapavarapu <rammohanganap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Can master and slave on different PG versions? |
| Date: | 2017-10-11 02:10:07 |
| Message-ID: | B193043A-AEFA-41A5-A45D-5A80839DB413@openscg.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 11:49, rammohan ganapavarapu <rammohanganap(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I am getting this error when i try to add 9.6 slave to 9.4 master.
>
> < 2017-10-09 22:56:31.081 UTC > FATAL: database files are incompatible with server
> < 2017-10-09 22:56:31.081 UTC > DETAIL: The data directory was initialized by PostgreSQL version 9.4, which is not compatible with this version 9.6.1.
>
> Ram
No, you cannot do that with physical streaming replication. They must be the same major version number. 9.5 -> 9.5.
>
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:06 PM, rammohan ganapavarapu
>> <rammohanganap(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Is it possible to add 9.6 version Slave to 9.4 master?
>>
>> Standard usage for Slony. I've used it for dozens of upgrades in place
>> with a few seconds switch over time. It's not as complex as it first
>> appears, but test on something other than production please.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Seiler | 2017-10-11 14:30:50 | Passwords in clear text in server log |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2017-10-10 22:18:42 | Re: FQDN for replication connection in pg_hba.conf |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-10-11 06:54:32 | Re: startup process stuck in recovery |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2017-10-11 01:42:32 | Re: core system is getting unresponsive because over 300 cpu load |