| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster |
| Date: | 2024-10-01 18:55:34 |
| Message-ID: | B136F620-E386-49BC-BE04-4CE49FB3D323@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 1 Oct 2024, at 00:43, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:21:30PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Yeah, I think a view like pg_stat_progress_checksums would work.
>>
>> Added in the attached version. It probably needs some polish (the docs for
>> sure do) but it's at least a start.
>
> Just a nitpick, but we call it data_checksums about everywhere, but the
> new view is called pg_stat_progress_datachecksums - I think
> pg_stat_progress_data_checksums would look better even if it gets quite
> long.
That's a fair point, I'll make sure to switch for the next version of the
patch.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-10-01 18:55:48 | Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation |
| Previous Message | Shayon Mukherjee | 2024-10-01 18:17:19 | Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX |