Re: JSON for PG 9.2

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date: 2011-12-13 15:40:49
Message-ID: B0DBAB6F-899F-4121-BA75-CA1A61DB3B80@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 13, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
>> Postgres would in fact make a wonderful 'nosql' backend with some
>> fancy json support -- document style transmission to/from the
>> backend without sacrificing relational integrity in storage.
>> Properly done this would be a fabulous public relations coup
>> (PostgreSQL = better nosql).
>
> PostSQL? ;-)

I think you meant to say "Postgre"... ;P
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-12-13 15:43:26 Re: LibreOffice driver 1: Building libpq with Mozilla LDAP instead of OpenLDAP
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-12-13 15:37:30 Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement