| From: | "Castle, Lindsay" <lindsay(dot)castle(at)eds(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Rod Taylor'" <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: One table or many tables for data set |
| Date: | 2003-07-23 02:14:04 |
| Message-ID: | B09017B65BC1A54BB0B76202F63DDCCA053248AA@auntm201 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Thanks Rod
My explanations will be better next time. :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Rod Taylor [mailto:rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:41 AM
To: Castle, Lindsay
Cc: Postgresql Performance
Subject: Re: One table or many tables for data set
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 21:50, Rod Taylor wrote:
> Ok.. Unless I'm missing something, the data will be static (or near
> static). It also sounds as if the structure is common for elements, so
> you probably only want 2 tables.
I misunderstood. Do what Joe suggested.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Christian Imbeault | 2003-07-23 07:05:00 | Performance hit of foreign key constraints? |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-07-23 02:10:59 | Re: One table or many tables for data set |