From: | Johannes Lochmann <johannes(dot)lochmann(at)topcontrol(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: restoring dum fast on one machine much slower on others |
Date: | 2016-11-17 07:44:02 |
Message-ID: | B0587F4C289A9E4AA474087E2B7E1579793796E0B3@srv01.topcontrol.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi Robert,
maybe different disk io systems? SSD vs. rotating rust? RAID vs. single spinning disk? Different disk caching behavior? Different command lines? fsync turned off on the fast box, maybe (please don't...)?
HTH
Johannes Lochmann
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] Im Auftrag von robert rottermann
Gesendet: Thursday, 17 November, 2016 8:19 AM
An: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Betreff: [ADMIN] restoring dum fast on one machine much slower on others
Hi there,
I run several Ubuntu boxes (at home, office, laptop ..) at on box restoring a dump from a live server takes some 10 sec, on all other it takes minutes.
Just now I run Ubuntu 16.04 on all boxes, but this behaviour was the same with older versions.
I did compare all files in /etc/postgresql/9.5/main/* They show no differences.
What could be the reason for this behaviour.
As I use this several times a day, I much prefer that faster load :)
thanks for your help
robert
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org) To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | robert rottermann | 2016-11-17 08:55:32 | Re: restoring dum fast on one machine much slower on others |
Previous Message | robert rottermann | 2016-11-17 07:18:50 | restoring dum fast on one machine much slower on others |