Re: How to hint 2 coulms IS NOT DISTINCT FROM each other

From: Kim Rose Carlsen <krc(at)hiper(dot)dk>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to hint 2 coulms IS NOT DISTINCT FROM each other
Date: 2016-10-28 18:53:49
Message-ID: AM4PR0501MB26108E40FC2BA5B398558799C7AD0@AM4PR0501MB2610.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>> JOIN a AS table_b
>> ON table_a.id = table_b.id
>> AND table_a.key = table_b.key

> Anyways, to use an index for that join, you'd need a composite index on id *AND* key, not two separate indexes.
Its not as much as for using the index, but to be able to push the where clause inside both JOINED tables.

The = operator already does this. It gives the planner the option to join the table in using either id = id or key = key. It can deduce that if I have a WHERE condition with table_a.key = 'Something', then table_b.key must also be 'Something'. It can then decide to filter table_b on key. When using IS NOT DISTINCT FROM, the planner is not considering the same options. Now its like it doesn't know table_a.key is same the same as table_b.key.

I would somehow expect the IS NOT DISTINCT FROM operator to do the same. As it establish the same rules.. If a = 'test' and a IS NOT DISTINCT FROM b then b = 'test' also

-
Kim Carlsen

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kim Rose Carlsen 2016-10-28 19:54:16 Re: How to hint 2 coulms IS NOT DISTINCT FROM each other
Previous Message Melvin Davidson 2016-10-28 18:53:22 Re: Remove Standby (SLAVE) from Primary (MASTER) - Postgres9.1