RE: Possible corrupt index?

From: Zahir Lalani <ZahirLalani(at)oliver(dot)agency>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Possible corrupt index?
Date: 2019-04-17 07:42:55
Message-ID: AM0PR06MB400498ED0A781F3568367FB0A7250@AM0PR06MB4004.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>I am not following above.
>What is running version 10?

Production is 9.6, others are 10 (as we are testing). Prod has always been fine, its been running for 2 years without a hitch. This issue has only occurred recently

>Did you restore a dump from a version 10 onto a >version 9.6 machine?

No - as I said, I don’t believe it’s a version issue as its been fine for 2 years.

>
>> What does:
>> SHOW lc_collate;
>
> en_US.UTF-8

>The above is the same for all the servers?

The upgraded 10 servers are en_GB.UTF_8. The current prod 9.6 is as above

Z

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Kane 2019-04-17 09:14:51 Re: Alter domain type / avoiding table rewrite
Previous Message Julie Nishimura 2019-04-17 05:51:07 Re: text search configuration missing while migration from 8.3 to 9.4