| From: | Roberto Della Pasqua <roberto(dot)dellapasqua(at)live(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Ford <robfordww(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | R: Postgresql 12.x on Windows (vs Linux) |
| Date: | 2020-03-02 15:01:34 |
| Message-ID: | AM0PR0502MB3650836EF6002C25848BF09B99E70@AM0PR0502MB3650.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Well,
on Windows you should try ReiserFS over a nvme optimized WHQL certified hardware.
Da: Robert Ford <robfordww(at)gmail(dot)com>
Inviato: lunedì 2 marzo 2020 15:42
A: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Oggetto: Postgresql 12.x on Windows (vs Linux)
I am aware that this might be a broad question, but I am not expecting very specific answers either:
When it come to running a modern PostgreSQL server, which serves say 1 TB of data, are there substantial differences in performance between Windows Server 2019 and Linux today? I know there are some issues with shared_buffers and windows, but does it manifest in real performance issues?
I have searched the web for this question, but is surprised to find very few concrete benchmarks on this. Anyone with real world experience on this topic?
best regards
RF
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin | 2020-03-02 15:06:23 | Re: Postgresql 12.x on Windows (vs Linux) |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2020-03-02 14:57:54 | Re: Postgresql 12.x on Windows (vs Linux) |